People usually see video
games as a simple “new generation” distraction, or even as
something bad... Those people, who mostly haven't grown up with
video games, and don't even play them, certainly would deny it the
status of art.
Is this point of view
legitimate ? Or can video games in fact be considered as an art ?
In my opinion, which many
“gamers” share, video games are an art. There is a plethora of
arguments that can support this.
First, what is art ?
According to the Penguin English dictionary, art is the conscious use
of skill and creative imagination, especially in the production of
aesthetic objects. Let's see if this definition fits video games.
"The conscious use of
skill" ; does making a video game require skill? Yes, in fact it
requires several skills. There are designers, programmers,
music composers, and even sometimes actors. Cinema, which is also
the sum total of many arts, is said to be the seventh art, therefore
video games are the tenth
art !
Let's continue with the
definition : "creative imagination"... This fits perfectly the video
game ! Effectively, the most way-out video games are generally the
most creative ones. Here is an example : Super Mario Bros. Nowadays,
this game has a worldwide reputation, and a lot of people know the eponymous heroes. But who could have imagined, before it was
released, that a plumber with a moustache was about to become an
international star ? I think that Shigeru Miyamoto, the creator, has
an amazing imagination. He created an entirely new universe ; people
were used to see fantasy worlds with elves, dwarves and other nice
creatures of that kind. But there is nothing like Super Mario Bros : walking mushrooms, magic pipes, and so on...
Finally, are video games
"aesthetic objects" ? Yes, they obviously are. Video games have been
aesthetic objects since their beginning, even when they were full of
big pixels, when High Definition did not yet exist. Maybe they were
even more beautiful, because developers had to be really imaginative
to make people recognize what's actually on the screen !
I think that we can add
something we find in several other definitions of art : art is
producing works to be appreciated primarily for their emotional
power. Once again, this is the case for video games. The graphic
design, the stories, and, very important, the music, create a whole
new imaginary world in which lots of different emotions are
experienced...
Another thing, which is
not obligatory for art, but which is present in a lot of works of
art, is the fact that it carries a message. This is true for most
video games which promote certain values, such as tolerance, or even
sometimes a political message.
Video games are art,
then, but why isn't it recognized as such ? I think this is normal ;
it is still in its infancy. Over time, it will be better accepted as
a cultural object, mostly because people who have grown up with video
games are becoming today's adults. Sometimes, people argue that it is
mainly an industry, that video games are made to be sold, so it is
not an art. This is absurd, of course : movies and books are
industries as well, and yet they're considered as works of art.
There is an other
interesting thing to notice : recognized artists are involved in
video game creation. For example, Hayao Miyazaki and his studio, who
made several well-known animation films, have realized the animated
scenes of a video game (Ninokuni : Another
World), and Steven Spielberg has also been involved in the
creation of several video games (like Boom Blox).
Like every form of art, video
games have their famous artists. Shigeru Miyamoto, with two others
video game creators, have even been knighted under France's Order of
Arts and Letters.
As it says above the
entrance of the Secession building in Vienna : "To
every age its
art and to
art its freedom". The
video
game
is
the
new
art
of
our
era...
Do you really consider this pursuit of aesthetic as an artistic quest ? In my opinion it's more because gamers always want a prettier game,with a visual aspect close from reality, but where there are fewer limits than in reality. They will always be unsatisfied and will look for a better toy, and use it until another one, even better, will be created.
ReplyDelete(btw, good job)
It depends on the game and on the persons. Some persons, as you say, will just take care of the graphics and buy the game only if it is in HD. But in my point of view, the artistic and aesthetic side of a video game doesn't only depends on the number of pixels. The story, musics, graphics, etc. are all forming a unique game ; and some oldies are more pleasant to watch than some today's games. I am not the only one to think that old games could be as great as today's ones : why do you think that there is more and more retrogaming nowadays ?
ReplyDeleteHere are some interesting links about art and video games :
An exhibition in Paris : http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-15663883
A discussion on the bbc : http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_9628000/9628274.stm
A video in french : http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xh6e42_le-jeu-video-est-il-l-avenir-de-l-art_videogames
Jenguiz